Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Syntax of Jeremiah 15:12

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
  • To: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Syntax of Jeremiah 15:12
  • Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:46:32 -0500

George:

You didn't read my total question, did you? Had you done so, you'd have
answered differently, because I asked in my original question how does KBYRYM
fit in, as where it is a noun elsewhere in Tanakh, it has the idea of a
blanket? Smashing blankets sounds absolutly nutso. Or do you have a different
translation for the lexeme? What about the other parts of my multi-part
question?

Karl W. Randolph.

----- Original Message -----
From: "George F Somsel" <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
>
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:29:42 -0500 "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
> writes:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George F Somsel" <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
> >
> > > > On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:18:46 -0500 "Karl Randolph"
> > > > <kwrandolph AT email.com>
> > > writes:
> > > > George:
> > > >
> > > > This is interesting: the root is claimed to exist, yet different
> > > > people have different lists where it is to be found. The
> > > > concordance I was told to buy by my teacher when I was a student
> > > > was by Lisowski, which is where I got the list of verses I
> > > > listed, and I see that BDB have a different list. One of the
> > > > verses found on both lists has one translation I proposed as a
> > > > possibility, Revelation 2:27 has a different translation allowed
> > > > by the unpointed text, neither of which uses “smash”. That’s just
> > > > one example. As a result, I find the evidence for the existance
> > > > of that root weak, at best.
> > > >
> > > > By the way, in the Job passage, who is the subject? What form is
> > > > this verb? How does it fit with the previous and following
> > > > verses? What is meant by KBYRYM seeing as other uses of this
> > > > lexeme as a noun in Tanakh refer to blankets? Or is this
> > > > adjectival use with the force of a noun, with the basic idea of
> > > > drawn out (make long of time) or expansive (make long width and
> > > > length)?
> > > >
> > > > Karl W. Randolph.
> > > _______________
> > >
> > > Subject: )"L in v. 23 above
> > > Form: Q impf 3 ms
> > > Connection: Note that in v. 23 they are said LaHa:LK )eL_)"L ***
> > > B.aM.i$:P.f+ *** In v. 24 judgment is rendered --YfRoa( .
> > >
> > Are you sure that these answers are right? Absolutely sure? The
> > reasons I asked the questions above is partially rhetorical. BTW,
> > what is “smashing blankets”? How does L) XQR fit in? Are we
> > dealing with a figure of speech whose meaning has been forgotten?
> > Quite frankly, “smashing blankets” doesn’t make much sense, but
> > you might make a case for “shaking out blankets”, or do you have
> > something else in mind?
> ______________
>
> What blankets? I see no blankets. Are you sure your head isn't under
> the covers?
>
> george
> gfsomsel
> ___________

--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page