b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Daniel Wagner" <dan.wagner AT netzero.net>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM")
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 18:26:26 -0400
Greg,
I apologize for provoking you by quoting you in a manner which you did not
appreciate, re: the below post (cited in full). It was not my intent to
misrepresent you or to cause confusion, and i'm sorry that such was the
apparent result. I personally don't *feel* like you understand my argument in
full yet, based on the nature of the feedback i've received (which is why i
made the comment), but my personal feelings are irrelevant.
Thanks,
Dan Wagner
----- Original Message -----
From: <GregStffrd AT aol.com>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Cc: <dan.wagner AT netzero.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM")
> In a message dated 05/11/2001 1:39:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> dan.wagner AT netzero.net writes:
>
> << Greg,
>
> It is fundamental to my view, although it might be ancillary to yours.
>
> Dan Wagner >>
>
>
> Dan,
>
> My point was very clear: It is the most unimportant part of this discussion
> *because* everyone seems prepared to grant the function you and Dave
> suggest.
> Once we get past that, and we have been for some time, the problem with
> your
> dual use of 'EHYEH comes to the fore.
>
>
> But note this contrast: You quoted me as saying:
>
> > The function of 'ASHER has to be the most unimportant point in this whole
> > discussion!
>
>
> What did I actually say? This:
>
> QUOTE
> The function of 'ASHER has to be the most unimportant point in this whole
> discussion! I believe most here are prepared to grant such a function to
> 'ASHER; it is your dual understanding of 'EHYEH that rips the heart from
> your
> position.
> END
>
>
> Please refrain from quoting only part of my comments, when what I actually
> said revolved around the importance of issues in dispute and issues that
> could and/or have been granted.
>
> When you do this it only creates more confusion.
>
> Greg Stafford
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [dan.wagner AT netzero.net]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>
NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net
-
RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM")
, (continued)
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), alanf00, 05/11/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Dave Washburn, 05/11/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Peter Kirk, 05/11/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Numberup, 05/11/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Bearpecs, 05/11/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Dave Washburn, 05/11/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Daniel Wagner, 05/11/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), GregStffrd, 05/12/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Peter Kirk, 05/12/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Dave Washburn, 05/12/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Daniel Wagner, 05/12/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), alanf00, 05/12/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Levdr, 05/13/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), GregStffrd, 05/13/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Bill Rea, 05/13/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Dave Washburn, 05/13/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Harold R. Holmyard III, 05/14/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), alanf00, 05/14/2001
- RE: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Dave Washburn, 05/15/2001
- Re: _)aSHER_ in Ex. 3:14 (was "I AM"), Bill Rea, 05/15/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.