Biblical Hebrew Forum

[GregStffrd AT aol.com]

In a message dated 05/12/2001 12:53:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dwashbur AT nyx.net writes:

<< It's easy 
 to say "Because the phrase FUNCTIONS as a nominal, it IS a 
 nominal, but it's another matter to prove it grammatically.   >>


Dear Dave:

It's hard for me to relate or respond to these kinds of observations and 
claims, so at this point I will simply thank you for the discussion and wish 
you well. I have given my reasons for disagreeing with your view, and you 
have given reasons why you believe your view is possible. 

I do not believe my requests for grammatical support have been satisfied. 
Instead, your response is that myself and others here have failed in 
demonstrating that a term functioning as a nominal is actually a nominal in 
the sentence in which it functions as such. . .  

Best regards,

Greg Stafford