sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:40:50 -0500
On 4/8/2010 7:41 AM, flux wrote:
> David Kowis (dkowis AT shlrm.org) wrote [10.04.08 21:22]:
>> I believe Jucato did the theme for the website, so he's probably good.
>
> I believe Jucato is good to stay as well, but we should probably check
> when the website stuff was done for fairness. Of course, I don't know if
> that technically matters, since I don't know what's defined as a year of
> "activity" in Tome (maybe he's done things even more recently than the
> site design, like wiki edits? Do simple wiki edits count as activity?).
Do I get to determine what's appropriate for contributions? I did check
when the website stuff was done. IIRC, the theme was done within a year
ago, as well. http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15284
He's been doing edits to the wiki as well.
>
>> Elisamuel has been keeping up in the wiki too, I suppose the question
>> can be up to him if he still desires to be a lead developer.
>
> Did you check the vote history? I have no idea who's missed votes (this
> goes for other leads as well, not just Elisamuel).
No, I did not check votes. I was looking at history in the wiki.
>
>> I can get the history back to 2009-05-26, not quite a year...
>
> When I do git log --since="one year ago", I get back to April 8 at
> least. It doesn't give an year ago in dates, because there would have
> had to be a commit on that date for it to show (just a reminder).
>
I can look at the recent changes in the wiki, and I can set the days=365
by hand. Doesn't seem to go back any further than 2009-05-26 no matter
how big I set max_days
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/RecentChanges?max_days=830
David
-
[SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Mathieu Lonjaret, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Elisamuel Resto, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Ladislav Hagara, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Eric Sandall, 04/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.