sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:41:28 +0900
David Kowis (dkowis AT shlrm.org) wrote [10.04.08 21:22]:
> I believe Jucato did the theme for the website, so he's probably good.
I believe Jucato is good to stay as well, but we should probably check
when the website stuff was done for fairness. Of course, I don't know if
that technically matters, since I don't know what's defined as a year of
"activity" in Tome (maybe he's done things even more recently than the
site design, like wiki edits? Do simple wiki edits count as activity?).
> Elisamuel has been keeping up in the wiki too, I suppose the question
> can be up to him if he still desires to be a lead developer.
Did you check the vote history? I have no idea who's missed votes (this
goes for other leads as well, not just Elisamuel).
> I can get the history back to 2009-05-26, not quite a year...
When I do git log --since="one year ago", I get back to April 8 at
least. It doesn't give an year ago in dates, because there would have
had to be a commit on that date for it to show (just a reminder).
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpXrEBR3TCFs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Mathieu Lonjaret, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Elisamuel Resto, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Ladislav Hagara, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Eric Sandall, 04/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.