sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 01:23:09 +0900
Jeremy Blosser (jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org) wrote [10.04.09 01:18]:
> Not really--the "code" components just require a commit. That could be
> fixing a one-letter typo in a description and it would still be a commit.
> It could, frankly, be adding a blank line to a file. The spirit there is
> clearly that they thought about the project enough to ping it vs. ignoring
> it entirely. The bar for leads is higher, hence the vote requirement that
> requires them to have some view of what's going on month to month.
>
> Keeping the low "commit once" bar relative to tome should just mean they
> made any kind of edit to our documentation/web content, whether they had
> access to apply it themselves or not.
Ahh, silly me. I was thinking too narrowly in terms of commit ->
repository, rather than the more general sense. This is good, thanks for
clarifying it for us (me). :)
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpSy_VeU4jCb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Mathieu Lonjaret, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
Elisamuel Resto, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Ladislav Hagara, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Haley, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
David Kowis, 04/08/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, flux, 04/08/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal, Eric Sandall, 04/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developers up for removal,
flux, 04/08/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.