Public SourceMage Discussion List

[David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>]

Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2009-10-08T10:30:Bor Kraljic:
> 
>>  - sometimes would be useful to have irclogs available online. just from 
>> #sourcemage other channels are mostly dead. I was on rockbox channel and 
>> then saw that they really have nice way if showing logs ( 
>> http://www.rockbox.org/irc/ ) [maybe we allready have this but I just 
>> couldn't find it]
> 
> I'm opposed to this. We have !menti which allows users to search the
> logs which is more than enough for most needs.
> 
> If we did publish logs we would need to notify each user that we do so
> and where those logs are and possibly provide a way to have them
> excluded from the logs.

There is no presumption to privacy on IRC. If we log the channels (which
are all publicly logged anyway,) and post the results, we don't have to
redact anything. The responsibility lies on you the individual to not
say something you don't want repeated.

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature