Public SourceMage Discussion List

[David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>]

Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2009-10-08T09:21:David Kowis:
> 
>> None of that text existed in 2006. So that's a new thing, since I've
>> looked at it. It was always a public network, and thus anyone could
>> record whatever they wanted. I consider it akin to talking in a large
>> room where anyone could walk in or out. I think scry's recording of the
>> channel stuff, as well as page_six's recording now fall into this
>> category. So we are logging the channels, and they are published. So I
>> guess we now have to "comply" with this nonsense.
> 
> Scry doesn't publish any channel logs. And last I checked page_six
> didn't as well. Please get the facts straight.
> 
> 

I do have the facts right. I guess now we have an argument over the
meaning of "publish."

Anyone can ask page_six for logs. Granted, they're pruned, but they are
published to the person asking. They're not published on a website, but
they are made available.

Also, you have told me that scry maintains logs of the conversations in
the channel. I even have a log of that conversation that I kept myself.
If scry doesn't share those logs, then why does it keep them?

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature