sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 11:52:57 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Friday 05 May 2006 06:06, Eric Sandall wrote:
>> One reason for not applying the themes to our versions (Sorcery's test,
>> stable, and devel branches and the devel, test, stable-rc, stable,
>> z-rejected, and games grimoires) is because non-descriptive names are
>> confusing.
>
> How about descriptive names then? They can still be fantasy related or at
> least less dull.
>
> (devel) := wild
> test := modern
> stable-rc := ancient
> stable := prehistoric
> z-rejected := necromantic
> games := bardic
>
> Just a bad example.
>
>> Take, for example, the following:
>> Grimoires:
>> terra
>> agua
>> air
>> luna
>> fuego
>> apothecary
>>
>> Now, which do you think is which? I thought of them as:
>> apothecary = devel (drugs kill people, and devel kills machines)
>> agua = test (water is fluid and often changing)
>> terra = stable (the earth is very stable)
>> luna = stable-rc (the moon is less stable than the earth, but orbits it)
>> fuego = z-rejected (fiery and unstable)
>> air = games (nothing of substance here, just fun! ;))
>>
>> Note I am not proposing these names, just trying to point out why I
>> prefer the current naming scheme for our branches to picking arbitrary
>> names.
> Your example is pretty good; I'd use fuego for devel and something bad for
> z-rejected (misery, death, plague).
>
I think we should stick to test, stable, etc.
Having fancy names makes things more confusing...
Apparently cast and dispel are complicated enough. Also, they're actions
not data. We have stable data, not earth data. Yeah the naming stuff is
cool and fun, but we've gotta keep some things easy and simple. Stable,
test etc. are easy and simple.
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=dBZX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, David Kowis, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Andrew Stitt, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jason Flatt, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jaka Kranjc, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Matthew Clark, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, David Kowis, 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Andrew, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Eric Sandall, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Andreas, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Andrew, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Karsten Behrmann, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Juuso Alasuutari, 05/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.