Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On May 06, David Kowis [dkowis AT shlrm.org] wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> > I know Eric is busy with finals, so as APL I'm calling for a vote on the
> > below amendment, as a more specific version of the suggested amendment
> > proposed earlier today.
> > 
> > Per the new policy[0], Leads should reply to the ML with signed +/- 1 or 0
> > votes.  Other developers may vote as well, but only Lead votes are 
> > binding.
> > The vote will last until 1PM CDT May 12th, or until a majority approves or
> > rejects it, whichever comes first.  This vote affects the voting policy, 
> > so
> > any lead or other developer can move for a veto at the end of the vote,
> > regardless of the results.
> > 
> > [0] - Not yet on the web site, but we're working on having it there today.
> > 
> 
> So if we're actually voting on this.

Yes, we are.

> I'll vote +1

+1 from me too (note, assistant votes are still non-binding, some people
were confused about that).

Attachment: pgpEfxVlKSugZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature