Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>]

Ladislav Hagara a écrit :
> These all nominations and votes seems funny for me if we have had always 
> only one candidate. :-)

Correct :-). But once Team Lead have been elected, they now have the 
legitimity to do anything they want since you agree to be lead by them.

> Responsibilities of team leads should be defined on wiki.
Yes.

As far as the sorcery team is concerned, leaded by Andrew, it seems (at 
least reading this mailing list) that he is the only active member of 
his team producing, releasing and testing the whole sorcery software.

As far as the ISO team is concerned, leaded by Unet, it seems that only 
me, BearPerson and David Kowis are the active members. So Unet is kinda 
inactive (except he seems to test every ISO release, especially x86-64 
... but without reporting publicly the test report).

So, those examples show that Team Lead, in practive, have various level 
of involvement and contribution.

> BTW, how long can team lead be inactive?

And what could be considered inactive? Since most people here are 
contributing on their spare time, we cannot require people (Team Lead 
included) to be active all the time. On the other way, we cannot rely 
that key decisions be taken by inactive Team Lead (since they will not 
be taken in the appropriate time frame).

Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO guru