sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- From: "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:59:21 +0100
Hi all,
I also find all this reorganization a good idea, keep up the good work
guys.
It made me ponder about splitting the ftp section in one for the
daemons/servers and one for the clients, but I'm unsure if it's a good
idea. And I would keep maintaining both anyways so it's not an issue atm
for me.
> Mmmh just a question, would it be possible (technically, p4 ?) to make
> subsections, even sub-subsections ?? It would make the things easier and
> would avoid to have dozens of sections at the same level. As an
> alternative,
> we can obviously do as usual : prefix the sections to make a kind of
> hierarchy.
I think I already asked about that once and I've been told it wasn't
possible. I don't remember though if it was a sorcery or a p4 issue.
Cheers,
Mathieu.
--
We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
--
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New archive and perl-cpan maintainer
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New archive and perl-cpan maintainer, Ladislav Hagara, 02/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New archive and perl-cpan maintainer, Jason Flatt, 02/18/2005
- [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Thomas Houssin, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Flavien Bridault, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Flavien Bridault, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Mathieu L., 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arjan Bouter, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.