sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:13:55 -0600
On Feb 24, Duane Malcolm [d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz] wrote:
> I was thinking the categories that Freshmeat or Sourceforge might help
> or be a guide. I'm thinking of using their categories for the science
> section. I noticed they don't have a usually separate libraries into a
> separate category. I also noticed a program can be part of many
> sections, or in their terms "topics". Would it be reasonable to have a
> flag in the DETAILS file called "TOPIC" or "CATEGORY". Just thinking out
> loud.
Can you describe what problem this would solve? It seems to me that it
would mostly make moving spells more difficult. Or were you thinking of
some kind of one-to-many relationship here?
Attachment:
pgpYgyK3KROMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Flavien Bridault, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Flavien Bridault, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Mathieu L., 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arjan Bouter, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Robin Cook, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.