sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:32:44 -0800
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:17 pm, Arjan Bouter wrote:
> From what I understand, the gnome spells and libs which form the gnome
> desktop
> very much depend on each other and have to be updated together for them to
> keep working. Correct me if I'm wrong but I guess splitting them into
> different sections maintained by differrent gurus would complicate matters
> by having to synchronize updates between sections...
> Same would be the case for kde and xfce I guess.
>
> I kind of like the way those sections are now, because one only has to
> browse one section to build those desktops. Instead of hunting the grimoire
> for apps which go with that particular environment.
>
> Don't get me wrong, the layout of the grimoires does need some attention :)
> Thanks for taking care of this guys.
>
> Arjan
While the core of the KDE desktop should be maintained together, there are
apps in that section that do not need to be maintained with the main core
packages. I'm not that familiar w/GNOME and XFCE, but I suspect there are
apps in both areas that do not /need/ to be there nor do they need to be
maintained with the core packages.
When I'm searching for a new program to fulfill some need (e-mail client, CD
burner, text editor, whatever...), I like to be able to go to one place and
browse and experiment with various programs until I find something I like.
With apps being placed based on their development library (GTK, QT, etc.),
rather than their function, that is not possible.
--
Jason Flatt
Father of five: http://www.flattfamily.com/
Linux user: http://www.sourcemage.org/ - http://www.lvlug.org/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Flavien Bridault, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Mathieu L., 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arjan Bouter, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Robin Cook, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jason Flatt, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Duane Malcolm, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arjan Bouter, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Jeremy Blosser, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer], Arwed von Merkatz, 02/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.