sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:03:45 +0100
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:43:46AM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Karsten Behrmann a écrit :
> >But about the glibc "bug", IMO the ISO should do what all SMGL boxes have
> >to fix this problem: put kernel sources in /mnt/root/usr/src/linux-foo/,
> >make a few symlinks and maybe "make whatever/config.h"
> >This is what all boxes that have once cast linux have, why not make the
> >ISO do it regardless of whether a kernel is being compiled or installed
> >from cache?
>
> glibc MUST use the headers from the glibc-kernel-headers spells, NOT
> from the linux spell. See
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7560 and its reference:
> http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Kernel/usr-src-linux-symlink.html.
>
> Source Mage is the only distribution i'm aware of that is still using
> (and which still have users trying to use) headers from the linux spell.
>
> So, not providing /usr/src/linux is in fact a good way to show this kind
> of bug. If http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8125 is related to
> this glibc supposed bug, then it should be marked as INVALID.
That bug has nothing at all to do with glibc. It's a fact that to
compile kernel modules you need the kernel source tree, so
/usr/src/linux should exist on a new install, as we have several spells
that install kernel modules. (Depending on linux won't help there, as
linux is installed by the iso afaik).
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Andrew, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.