sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:46:28 +0100
Arwed von Merkatz a écrit :
Where does this asm dir come from? Why is it useful? (The headers
explicitly include stuff in asm-i386, so nothing in that is multi-arch)
The asm is usually a symlink to asm-<ARCH>. But if you are compiling on a multi-arch system (ie, a system capable of running binary from multiple architecture, like i486 + x86_64), the symlink cannot point at the very same time to asm-i386 AND asm-x86_64. The solution was to remove the symlink and create a small header file that includes the proper headers based on compiler flags (internal defines). Look at /usr/include/asm/errno.h for instance.
Since x86_64 is no longer on target, I will remove this from the next ISO release.
The odd thing is that those files _are_ in the glibc-kernel-headers
install log on the iso but don't get removed when it gets dispelled due
to the conflict in glibc. And this is not caused by glibc, as the spell
doesn't edit these logs anymore.
??? If the files are in the install logs, why they are not removed? BTW, the glibc spell no longer edit the logs in devel and test, but not in stable! :-)
Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO guru
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Andrew, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/15/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/16/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.