sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:50:43 +0100
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:46:28PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Arwed von Merkatz a écrit :
> >Where does this asm dir come from? Why is it useful? (The headers
> >explicitly include stuff in asm-i386, so nothing in that is multi-arch)
>
> The asm is usually a symlink to asm-<ARCH>. But if you are compiling on
> a multi-arch system (ie, a system capable of running binary from
> multiple architecture, like i486 + x86_64), the symlink cannot point at
> the very same time to asm-i386 AND asm-x86_64. The solution was to
> remove the symlink and create a small header file that includes the
> proper headers based on compiler flags (internal defines). Look at
> /usr/include/asm/errno.h for instance.
>
> Since x86_64 is no longer on target, I will remove this from the next
> ISO release.
>
> >The odd thing is that those files _are_ in the glibc-kernel-headers
> >install log on the iso but don't get removed when it gets dispelled due
> >to the conflict in glibc. And this is not caused by glibc, as the spell
> >doesn't edit these logs anymore.
>
> ??? If the files are in the install logs, why they are not removed? BTW,
> the glibc spell no longer edit the logs in devel and test, but not in
> stable! :-)
We're not talking about glibc in test or stable here, so that doesn't
matter :)
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Andrew, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/15/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/16/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.