sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:49:03PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Arwed von Merkatz a écrit :
> >The current glibc spell in devel is almost ready to go to test. I added
> >some stuff to work around problems with the very odd
> >glibc-kernel-headers setup the 0.9.3 iso installed today, after someone
> >has tested it on a new install from 0.9.3 it can go to test imo.
>
> Which odd glibc-kernel-headers setup? What bugs are you refering to?
Several things are in the glibc-kernel-headers that definitely aren't
normal:
1) it installs all headers, i386, ppc, sparc, ...
2) the /usr/include/asm it installs has files for /usr/include/mach-*,
those are supposed to be directories, and always have been as far as i
can tell
3) for some reason /usr/include/asm/mach-* don't get removed on dispel
of glibc-kernel-headers, leading to glibc cast failing when it tries to
copy the kernel headers
> >Once it's in the test grimoire it will go to stable as soon as it got
> >some more testing, at most two weeks later.
> >
> >If that's not soon enough for the next ISO I can probably merge the
> >stability/upgrade fixes I did for the devel glibc spell into the test
> >and stable glibc spell.
>
> I have no problem with that timing myself, except if someone is waiting
> for an ISO soon. Anyone?
>
> By the way, do we thus agree that the proper way to build the ISO is
> using the stable grimoire ONLY? I have no problem using another grimoire
> (like test or devel or whatever) provided it's agreed on (and that it
> allows to build an ISO of course :-)).
The ISO should always use stable grimoire and stable sorcery, as that's
what users are supposed to use after installing, and downgrading stuff
is not what we plan for when working on the grimoire.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Andrew, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO, Eric Sandall, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/15/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.