Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:20:52PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> >I'll test the devel's glibc spell as well and report the success/failure 
> >in bugzilla.
> 
> I tested the glibc spell in devel and reported some bugs (see below).
> 
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8237
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8238
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8239
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8240
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8241
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8242
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8244
> 
> I'll test again when those bugs will be fixed.
 
Ok, none of those are new, all of them apply the same for the test and
stable glibc, so does anyone see a reason to hold back the new glibc
spell from test?
If no one has a very good reason I plan to integrate it in the next
days, we really need to have a glibc spell in test and stable that does
not break lots of boxes right after the installation.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org