sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
- From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:46:49 +0000
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:47:44PM -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> If somebody wrote a specification for how we would store that info, they
> can put it into a bug report and give the developers something to shoot
> at after it has been discussed and agreed upon by those involved.
> Otherwise, nothing will get done.
>
> I prefer before we start writing code to sit down and think about the
> process and document it. This also gives documenters a better hope at
> understanding the implementation so as to better write it up for
> non-developers.
>
I was wondering when this would be brought up... would be nicer if it
happened with EVERY sub-project that is worked on in SMGL.
For a nice example of how to do this, see the proposal, design and
implementation docs on the wiki for simple-init (rycee, you are still my
hero!). This is "how we should work".
erics
--
Eric D. Schabell M.Sc. - Z-Rejected Guru - http://www.sourcemage.org
irc: irc.freenode.net (#sourcemage), nick -> erics
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Bas van Gils, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Karsten Behrmann, 10/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Ladislav Hagara, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
VladimĂr Marek, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Andrew, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Eric Schabell, 10/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, andrew fries, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
-
One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Piero Ottuzzi, 10/05/2004
-
Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
- Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring), Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
-
Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Thomas Matysik, 10/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.