sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:31:04 +0000
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:23:32PM +0200, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> Hey all!
> Just wanted to bring this up again, it was on the list years ago, IIRC.
> The basic idea is that everyone willing runs an ftp server on their
> /var/spool/sorcery, giving us a huge network of mirrors.
So are you talking about adding more fallback urls? Are the current few
not enough?
>
> You could download a file that's outdated without any trouble, It'll
> stick around for a bit.
> Also, you could download a large file in parts from different servers,
> using all your available bandwidth for a change.
That would require sorcery to work with prozilla, currently it doesnt,
adding code to do so is a fairly big change.
> Who could run a central server for round-robin?
We could remove the code in sorcery to round-robin them and instead do
a round-robin dns of fallback.sourcemage.org instead or something...
-
[SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Karsten Behrmann, 10/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Cory S, 10/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Bas van Gils, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Karsten Behrmann, 10/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Ladislav Hagara, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
VladimĂr Marek, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Andrew, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Eric Schabell, 10/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, andrew fries, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
- One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring), Piero Ottuzzi, 10/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Cory S, 10/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.