sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring)
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring)
- Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:48:47 -0400
And I see this was all already discussed, so you may ignore my
comments :)
On Tue, 2004-05-10 at 07:32 -0400, Paul Mahon wrote:
> There is a problem with distributing caches. The depends info isn't
> distributed with it, causing problems if it is recast. There is a desire
> to have this information in the tarball, but no one on the sorcery team
> has done it. It may, in the end, be done with the installed grimoire
> idea.
>
> As for round robin FTP, why not just use bittorrent?
>
> On Tue, 2004-05-10 at 09:54 +0200, Piero Ottuzzi wrote:
> > Hi my friends,
> >
> > I think the idea Karsten is proposing is very nice and based on the same
> > idea
> > I would like to go one step further...
> > Mirroring of source packages is nice... but what if we're going to mirror
> > also
> > precompiled packages?
> > I mean: how many there has a full system precompiled with k7 optimization?
> > So.. I'm starting the installation with k7 optimization and the system
> > ask to
> > me if I want to download pre-compiled packages (if available and thus
> > using
> > the distributed mirroring to fetch precompiled archives) or if I want to
> > compile everything from sources.
> > I know this "one step further" is not as trivial as saying it but it
> > would be
> > a nice feature...
> >
> > Let me know what you think... I have some ideas on how to implement it...
> > I
> > can put this ideas on wiki...
> >
> > Ciaoo
> > Apiero
> >
> > Alle 21:23, venerdì 1 ottobre 2004, Karsten Behrmann ha scritto:
> > > Hey all!
> > > Just wanted to bring this up again, it was on the list years ago, IIRC.
> > > The basic idea is that everyone willing runs an ftp server on their
> > > /var/spool/sorcery, giving us a huge network of mirrors.
> > >
> > > You could download a file that's outdated without any trouble, It'll
> > > stick around for a bit.
> > > Also, you could download a large file in parts from different servers,
> > > using all your available bandwidth for a change.
> > >
> > > What's the count on people interested?
> > > Who could run a central server for round-robin?
> > > Maybe we can get this thing running this time!
> > > So Far,
> > > Karsten Behrmann
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Ladislav Hagara, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
VladimĂr Marek, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Andrew, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Eric Schabell, 10/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Seth Alan Woolley, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, andrew fries, 10/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring,
Andrew, 10/04/2004
-
One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Piero Ottuzzi, 10/05/2004
-
Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
- Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring), Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
-
Re: One step further (was: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring),
Paul Mahon, 10/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distributed/peer-to-peer mirroring, Thomas Matysik, 10/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.