sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Dufflebunk said:
> Might we perhaps want to make z-rejected a grimoire of it's own? I would
> add the suggestion considering the ability of putting spells in more
> than one section (via symilnks), or being able to make sections have
> arbitrary depth for sub-categorisation.
As for actually separating games, I think it's a good idea as games are
not really needed for a working machine (and as you've noticed Hamish, not
many of us play the games, otherwise there'd be many more bugs, or would
have until you came along ;)). If we do this, I would also like to
separate z-rejected as well, we can then have the following setup:
[devel|test|stable]/<sections left>
games/[3D, arcade, strategy, etc.]
z-rejected/[games, devel, libs, etc.]
As a default install (ISO) I would like only the stable grimoire, no games
nor z-rejected. We'll have to document this on the wiki so people don't
say, "There's no Java!" or, "No games?". :)
Anyone (Tony?) know how we can get Perforce to do this?
Thoughts?
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Hamish Greig, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
M.L., 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Dufflebunk, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
M.L., 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Womack, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Tony Smith, 06/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
M.L., 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Eric Sandall, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
Dufflebunk, 06/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?,
M.L., 06/16/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.