Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>]

Eric Sandall wrote:
> Eric Womack said:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > > No, they will just be grimoires you can add with 'scribe add
> > > <grimoire>',
> > > as scribe defaults to appending ' from
> > > http://codex.sourcemage.org/<grimoire>.tar.bz2'
> > >
> > > -sandalle
> >
> > Just to throw two more of my cents, I fully support the idea of a
> > z-rejected/binary only grimoire - but only one version, perhaps?  Not a
> > full
> > devel/test/stable setup as it seems too much for someone to attend to.
>
>
> Absolutely!  I was hoping that it was implied, but I guess I should have
> mentioned that explicitly.  ;)  Same with the 'games' grimoire if/when
> that is done.
>
> -sandalle

I'm all for moving z-rejected into it's own grimoire.  I've been for it 
for months.  For that particular section, I felt, if we're going to 
reject something, either completely move it out of the main grimoire so 
that the user makes a conscous effort to have them available through a 
scribe add, or to just add the warning message and integrate them into 
the main grimoire, not set them off to the side.  In other words, all or 
nothing, with preference given to all.  A second reason for moving it 
out had to do with the fact that it mirrored the main grimoire so well. 
 Spells from every other part of the grimoire were appearing, and by 
making it a grimoire, we could add multiple sections with in it for 
where each spell would belong if they were not rejected.

Anyways, if we're going to do this, let me know, and I'll begin work on 
setting it up as a grimoire.

Geoff