permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: Toby Hemenway <toby@patternliteracy.com>
- To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [permaculture] Trends in America
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:09 -0700
Steve,
Interesting that you would miss my specific qualifications that I hoped would forestall exactly your knee-jerk. I wrote that (note emphasis):
"private ownership is /one way/ to encourage responsibility toward resources,[not the only one, yes?] . . . and that a culture /that is used to private ownership/ is liable to behave irresponsibly toward resources held in common." You're the one doing the generalizing, not me; I didn't mention land at all. The issue of private ownership sure is an emotional trigger, isn't it!
I've seen the arguments debunking Garret Hardin's book, too. I'm aware that there is a long tradition in many places of responsible treatment of the commons. Contemporary western culture isn't one of them, nor are commons treated well in many overpopulated places.
I like Kris's observation that having your name on a mug means everyone knows who left it out. That's also part of creating a successful commons: when a community grows so large as to allow anonymity, overuse of the commons often results. And care for the commons can't occur when all things are viewed as resources rather than as the sources of life.
Toby
http://patternliteracy.com
Steve Read wrote:
Hello, Toby Hemenway,
Interesting approach to extrapolte from one PDC and its mug praxis to principles
and strategies of land tenure; It reminds me too of the platitudinous arguments
that Thatcher & Co. put forward to justify selling off the council owned
housing, frankly I rarely saw a run down council house except on estates that had
been designanted as 'problem' estates by the local council and were then
therefore following some strange logic of their own refilled with more 'problem'
families. And then of course council blocks that fell into disrepair and misuse
becaus ethey were simply so badly designed.
Your argument also belies the fact that for prbably millenia humane societies
have enabled land tenure strategies that allowed sustainable, durable use of
commonly held assets. Th
e fatuous book 'Tragedy of the commons' has been massively instrumental in creating a mythology around this subject. Your argument also imo seems to betray a certian myopia, looking out the window do I see a world where privately owned resources are not destructively exploited, a world where privately property is tended and nurtured for subsequent generations? Or do I see a world where the traditional class layers have gone to be replaced by one big squandering propertied class in the rich countries and those that are becoming fatter? For myself I only have to go to the municipal dump to see where private property ends up, even when still in good condition.
I imagine that you personally however are tending well your private patch of Earth, your private Eden.
And of course there's Renting property out, what a great way to increase my
income, living off the sweat and labour of others, keeping the world split
into have's and have nots and of course expecting the people who are renting
the property to look after it as if it were their own, well how is it they
can do that in rented accomodation and yet wouldn't be able to do it in
commonly held accomodation?
I would however agree with you Toby that there is some education to be done,
its not difficult, one simply transports the emotional content that one has
for 'mine' to 'ours'. I frankly fail to see that if we can't do this and that
as designers we are not promoting this how we are to move along towards
sustainable interconnected communities.
Buy the land and free it into a safe common legal entity, then help people
develop the capacity to nurture it, and in this I am speaking too and perhaps
in particular of the urban areas. This definately seems to be the philosophy
developing here in France.
Steve R
======= At 2008-10-30, 04:45:47 you wrote: =======
A story I may have told before: On opening day of a PDC, the venue was kind enough to put out mugs, each with a participant's name on it. They asked that each person be responsible for rinsing and putting away their own mug. The system worked beautifully; the classroom stayed free of scattered mugs; each was back in the rack at the end of the day. Then, come our mid-class day off, the mugs were put through an industrial sterilizer and the labels were removed. They went back to the classroom unlabeled. Within a few days, mugs were everywhere--under chairs, on shelves, left outside, many full of molding tea leaves, and another couple of dozen mugs had been commandeered from elsewhere since no one could find a clean mug and it was easier to grab another from the stash. Soon almost every mug the place had was in our classroom, dirty and haphazardly stuck anywhere.
I was pretty surprised, since the participants seemed like decent folks. The lesson I took home was twofold: private ownership is one way to encourage responsibility toward resources, and, a culture that is used to private ownership is liable to behave irresponsibly toward resources held in common.
Toby
http://patternliteracy.com
Nancy Frank wrote:
Steve -_______________________________________________
I think it will be awhile before we get as far as we've come and return to common land.
Nancy
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subscribe or unsubscribe here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
Google command to search archives:
site:https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture searchstring
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Best regards. Steve Read
steveread@free.fr
2008-10-30
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subscribe or unsubscribe here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
Google command to search archives:
site:https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture searchstring
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America
, (continued)
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Scott Pittman, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
KSantoyo, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Nancy Frank, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Margaret L. Wilson, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Steve Read, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Nancy Frank, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Toby Hemenway, 10/29/2008
- [permaculture] Trends in America, Steve Read, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Trudie Redding, 10/30/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Trudie Redding, 10/30/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Margaret L. Wilson, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Toby Hemenway, 10/30/2008
- [permaculture] Trends in America, Steve Read, 10/30/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Nancy Frank, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, christopher nesbitt, 10/30/2008
- [permaculture] Trends in America, Steve Read, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, christopher nesbitt, 10/30/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
KSantoyo, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Scott Pittman, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in (Meso)America ;-), christopher nesbitt, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [permaculture] Trends in America,
Scott Pittman, 10/29/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Trudie Redding, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Scott Pittman, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Trudie Redding, 10/30/2008
- Re: [permaculture] Trends in America, Nancy Frank, 10/30/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.