Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - RE: [NAFEX] Interstem Apples

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ed Fackler" <efackler@woh.rr.com>
  • To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [NAFEX] Interstem Apples
  • Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:53:25 -0400

Ginda:

Yes we used the 9/111 combo extensively and the primary difference was
the amount of suckering from the MM111 which was extensive.

ed



Ed, did you also experiment with M9 on M111?

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 12:19 PM, Ed Fackler wrote:

> Derry:
>
> There was a mistake in the wording on my original message. Or,
> instead
> of MM111 it should have read MM106 and with this combination (9 on
> MM106)
> there is no suckering at all when the lower graft union is burried.
> We left
> the upper 2" of the 9 section exposed. Resulting tree size was around
> 10-12' with Gala as the fruiting variety.
>
> ed
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page