market-farming AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Market Farming
List archive
- From: "GlobalCirclenet" <webmaster AT globalcircle.net>
- To: market-farming AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: new terminology
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:15:15 -0600
Nonsense. Nobody accidentally misunderstood what I said. Market farming by
definition is not commodity selling to middlemen and processors, but
directly to consumers. Since we're market farmers here, you're telling us
in effect that this whole discussion about certification is irellevant. I
don't think so. Anyone else think it's irellevant to market farming?
Try again.
paul & barb - on the continental divide
http://globalcircle.net
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/17/2002 at 7:43 PM Rick Williams wrote:
>
>If you do not sell commodity organic products, why would you really need
>certification?
>
>Why is that question associated in some way with some kind of corporate
>line?
>
>Your responses are often very odd as they seem to not be connected with
the
>issue at hand. Which if you noticed you chose not to answer and went off
>with this red herring approach.
>
-
Re: New terminology
, (continued)
- Re: New terminology, RDH, 10/16/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/16/2002
- RE: new terminology, RDH, 10/16/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/16/2002
- RE: new terminology, GlobalCirclenet, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, RDH, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, Liz Pike, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, Chris Sawyer, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, Liz Pike, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/17/2002
- RE: new terminology, GlobalCirclenet, 10/18/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/18/2002
- RE: new terminology, jay gee, 10/18/2002
- RE: new terminology, Liz Pike, 10/19/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/19/2002
- RE: new terminology, jay gee, 10/19/2002
- RE: new terminology, Rick Williams, 10/19/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.