Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] digital cameras

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Lyman Green <lymang AT gmail.com>
  • To: Bruce <bruce AT synthesiscreative.com>
  • Cc: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] digital cameras
  • Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:46:02 -0500

Excellent, thanks for the tip on that camera.

If anyone is interested I"ll let you all know what I decide.


On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:36:13 -0500, Bruce <bruce AT synthesiscreative.com> wrote:
> Sounds like you have it well thought through. I hate to add another to
> your list but I've been using a Fuji S2 for nearly 2 years and it is
> still well regarded. I've had no troubles and use it with a Nikkor
> 24-85 f3.5-4.5 G lens. I don't know what the price range is now but I
> do know they just released an upgraded S3 so the price may be dropping.
> I believe it is based on the Nikon N80 body although I'm not very
> familiar with the full Nikon camera line.
>
> Even at full RAW mode [it interpolates up to 12 mp] a 512mb card will
> give you 38 frames. I prefer to buy a few smaller cards than one large
> one because I still worry about failure - hey, I'm a suspenders and a
> belt kind of guy.
>
> One thing to keep in mind when you take digital photos with large file
> sized, hard disk space will be in high demand. If you take a lot of
> photos archiving becomes a challenge as well. I currently archive using
> hard drives - I know videographers who do the same thing.
>
> -b
>
> Bruce DeBoer
> Director of Marketing and Business Development
> Synthesis
> 112 S. Blount St. Ste. 101
> Raleigh, NC 27601
> Main: 919-523-6385
> Fax: 919-829-8299
> bruce AT synthesiscreative.com
> www.synthesiscreative.com
> Photography website: www.brucedeboer.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Lyman
> Green
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 12:50 PM
> To: zman
> Cc: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] digital cameras
>
> Well, I'm no pro, that's for sure, but I am very interested in getting
> a digital SLR body that I can buy lenses for - something that can
> essentially expand/upgrade over time. It looks like the Canon and the
> Nikon are both good choices, and both run about 1K retail right now,
> give or take. Online reviews of the two give the Nikon a tiny edge in
> the ones I've seen, but it seems clear both are good cameras. I am
> going to try and find a place that has both and get a physical feeling
> for both tonight. The Nikon D70 is apparently heavier and more
> solidly built, which is a big attraction to me. Since I have no lens
> investment in either Nikon (the lenses are Nikkor, I believe from what
> I read, either D or G type) or Canon (EF or EF-S mounts, I believe
> from what I have read) I'm really at liberty to pick here which one I
> like better.
>
> My thoughts on a starting package:
>
> Camera and probably the default lens that comes with the "kit" package
> - I think on the Canon that's an 18-55 and on the Nikon they have a
> kit with something that goes to 70? Not sure.
>
> CF memory card, probably one large one (1GB?) and maybe 1 or 2 small
> ones (might purchase these later online)
>
> Case for the camera to protect it
>
> If I go with the Canon I'll take a look at the battery grip, but Nikon
> has an edge here - I gather you can buy over the counter not too
> expensive batteries that will work in a pinch, whereas the Canon has
> no such alternative.
>
> I think later I'll work on more lenses or other accessories (like a
> separate flash unit)
>
> Still researching.
>
> Thanks to everyone who posted on this so far, by the way.
>
> Lyman
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:39:53 -0500 (EST), zman
> <zman AT shell.neverwhere.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Lyman Green wrote:
> > > Anyone on the list have a Canon Digital Rebel or a Nikon D70?
> Looking
> > > for info on these digital SLR's from a real person (as opposed to a
> > > faceless internet reviewer).
> >
> > The Canon does well for a consumer most of the Pros I know are using
> the
> > D70. Especially since ALL the Nikon lenses work. Canon has changed
> their
> > mount a couple of times. I know of at least 3 pros in the area that
> are
> > using the D70 as their primary camera. I know of no pros using the
> Canon.
> > The prices on the D70 will most likely come down a little more in the
> next
> > couple of months as Nikon is getting ready to release the repalcement
> for
> > the D100.
> >
> > Scott H. Zekanis
> > zman AT kungfumonkey.com
> > http://www.rod-o-rama.com
> > http://www.thehellbenders.com
> > 1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 425" Nailhead)
> > 1959 GMC in Chevy Sheetmetal 1/2 Ton (235" Inline 6)
> > 1990 Ducati 750 Sport
> >
>
> --
> ". . . No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the
> life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence--that which makes
> its truth, its meaning--its subtle and penetrating essence. It is
> impossible. We live, as we dream--alone. . . ."
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>


--
". . . No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the
life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence--that which makes
its truth, its meaning--its subtle and penetrating essence. It is
impossible. We live, as we dream--alone. . . ."




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page