Homestead mailing list

[Leslie <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>]

KUDOS

--- On Sun, 1/11/09, rayzentz AT aim.com <rayzentz AT aim.com> wrote:

From: rayzentz AT aim.com <rayzentz AT aim.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Cold weather, again, coming for some
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 10:52 AM

Thank you for the permission to make fun of Algore. While I don't feel it
was necessary, I appreciate it, and will continue to do so. The reason I
mentioned it is that we are having record cold and snowfalls in this area. Of
course, it's just a precursor to the new Ice age that global warming is
causing. Just watch The Day After, and you will see...



For the record, I have no doubt that climate change is occurring. It always
does. There is a huge history of it in the fossil record. I don't buy the
argument that WE are causing it, especially when you weight the argument that 
a
single Mount Pinatubo(?) eruption puts more particulates and gases into the 
air
than mankind has in his ENTIRE HISTORY. I also find it most interesting that
Mars seems to be experiencing global warming, as is Venus. My SUV undoubtedly
causes that, too.

Now, does this mean I oppose arguments that we need to husband resources more
carefully?? No. But don't force things on me because of fear and panic of
mindless drones who fear the sky is falling.

Ray





      
>From bobford79 AT yahoo.com  Sun Jan 11 11:09:46 2009
Return-Path: <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id D9C4D4C014; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:09:46 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
        version=3.2.3
Received: from web53904.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53904.mail.re2.yahoo.com
        [206.190.36.214])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E1664C00F
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:09:46 -0500 
(EST)
Received: (qmail 39124 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2009 16:09:46 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 
sB8o4nkVM1kzIB0mXArcr.LnB8QpUk4TMALW6AwsMI85FOj_rHJptMl6paU35_9JnDY_dLTzr.nCD6FZsyOfelUoox3_IUJcwk0AJdBrcg99twn17warrjb_ANnfa_m9.UZMuZT3cqXC5O1wcdwjYsoc483DH4plXScEH8N9PPA4pJFN5RruHb_YDO5w4Lx2Xirie4jWYmdY2IHs_J5Vwg1r8hPJsA--
Received: from [68.227.240.219] by web53904.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP;
        Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:09:45 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:09:45 -0800 (PST)
From: bobf <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
In-Reply-To: <18c9df6e0901110758v4cd5ea21w8ecca07e370b43e5 AT mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <168830.39014.qm AT web53904.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff interview,
        immeninent dem
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:09:47 -0000

Couldn't that "move' directive be also given to folk who reside in the city 
who are 'now' being subsidized by the government? 

" You want to eat, no more government subsidy, instead, 'move' to an area 
where you can grow food.--  You want free healthcare 'move back' to Mexico 
and let your own government provide. -- You live on the edge of the city and 
want the government to subsidize light rail or buses, why?; 'move' to the 
inner city and walk to work and market.

The 'move' argument is not helpful, at all.  Why should ruralites be 
penalized so that metro residents can be subsidized?


---------------------------------------------------------------------


--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Marie McHarry <mmcharry AT gmail.com> wrote:


> Drive less. get more fuel efficient vehicles. Be self-sufficient to
>the point that fuel for vehicles isn't a big thing. You need to do
>that in any case as the price of fuel will go back up and only go
>higher. What do you want? A government subsidy. If you need to be
> close to a city,  move.