Homestead mailing list

["Wendy" <crazygardens AT verizon.net>]

Most studies on anything should be ignored.  I think they should be required 
to name who funded the study to be published.  I took a class in college 
that required us to take a survey topic and prove it regardless of whether 
the outcome was actually what could be predicted or not.  It was a class in 
statistical methodology.  We used the phrasing of our questions and the 
selection of our sample.  What I learned was that ANYTHING can be proven if 
it is presented and sampled correctly.  At the time, I thought the class was 
a waste of my time.  But I have relied on what I learned from that class so 
many times throughout my life to spot the BS that I wish I had taken it more 
seriously at the time.

I don't believe that statins can cause cancer.  I believe that cancer is an 
anaerobic virus we get by consuming other cancer infested flesh, similar to 
how cattle contracts BSE.  Our bodies can control cancers until we have a 
situation where tissue is weakened or is unable to heal (statins).  That is 
the link.  The cancer was already present when the statins were 
administered, but it didn't cause it, just allowed it to express.  Severe 
liver problems would be just a natural outcome of long term use of statins. 
How statins work is to inhibit liver function.  That is their purpose.  The 
problem with any drug that artificially inhibits any metabolic function in 
the body is that many, many functions are linked and use the by-products of 
one function in another.  Inhibiting one function can greatly impact 
another.

Wendy


> Another problem with medications is that a lot of the studies done on them
> are very selective as to who is in the study.  They know in advance what 
> the
> possible side effects may be and then choose folks who statistically,
> historically, medical history-wise won't get the side-effects.
>
> The statins mentioned in the article are just such a medication.  The
> studies done on them showed few side-effects.  The results IRL are that 
> well
> over 15% of the folks who take prescription statins have *serious*
> side-effects--muscle paralysis, amnesia, severe liver problems, CANCER, 
> etc.
> And Big-Pharma has worked real hard to keep the studies linking them to
> cancer well buried!
>
> Lynda
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "bobf" <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
>
>
> > This article is in today's Washington Post and cerns not only danger with
> > mixing medications, but also supplements and over the counter meds.  I
> > have had more than one of the reactions in the article myself (blood
> > thinner, aspirin, & something else, & the doc forgot to tell me, at 
> > first,
> > to quit taking niacin -- which I had taken for years-- when I started
> > statins).  Soemone well educated on plants and supplements like Roxanne 
> > or
> > Susan Jane probably know  all of this stuff, but it is hard for me to 
> > keep
> > up with allpossible interactions.........................
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/crazygardens%40verizon.net
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead