Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] metal homes

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] metal homes
  • Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:41:41 -0600


The trouble with modern materials and techniques is that they are expensive to develop. Few of us have the reputation of Bucky Fuller. I would like to see someone of that stature delve into the field again but housing is so dominated by single point suppliers and innovation stifling building codes that I suspect it will have to be someone more the stature the builders in the "Home Work" book. A perfect task for a homesteader in a no building code area.

The challenges of developing low-cost, widely available housing are beyond building codes, materials and techniques, and the stature of the innovator. Such a dream has been pursued by many, including men of substantial stature. No less than Frank Lloyd Wright attempted such a task. His Usonian houses were the best he could do. They were the inspiration for Joseph Eichler's simple, flat-topped houses that were the bottom of the price line when I entered real estate in 1969.

"This would lead him in the early 1930s to dream up Broadacre City, his utopian plan for a landscape crisscrossed by highways—a low-rise and low-density community, with a few odd high-rise apartment towers for unreconstructed urbanites, a formula, some complained, for suburban sprawl, and Wright's response to Corbusier's city plans. Misplaced in its practical concept of urbanism or not, this same socializing spirit inspired his L-shaped Usonian house for less affluent suburbanites (Wright made up the word, deriving it from the "United States of North America"; he claimed the houses could be built for $5,000 to $10,000), a humane vision that became popular.
"Hundreds of these houses were built and they made an impact on progressive American modernist architects while also anticipating the ranch house developments of postwar America, with their cookie-cutter planned communities. Wright's houses called for connected dining and living quarters, a workspace instead of a conventional kitchen, overhanging roofs, wood siding, strip windows, concrete foundations, and a modern carport. They were efficient, spare, and light. They recognized an increasing informality in society and a desire for homes that were easy to use. Wright hated the banality of Levittowns, but Levitt himself rightly credited Wright for having set a standard for what low-cost housing might be."

From a review of:
The Dreams of Frank Lloyd Wright
By Michael Kimmelman
Frank Lloyd Wright
by Ada Louise Huxtable
Lipper/Viking, 251 pp., $19.95

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18174








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page