cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)

From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:39:40 +0100

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:42:22 -0500 Hal Abelson wrote:

> I believe that GFDL tries to address this issue.

My own personal opinion is that the GFDL fails miserably in this
respect (and in other ones, as well)...

The definition of "Transparent format" in the GFDL is contorted and
flawed. As I said in my other reply, I am convinced that the best
definition of source code is the one found in the GNU GPL.

--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpaoFIoTZuyl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Sarah Pearson, 01/29/2015
- [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Ben Finney, 01/29/2015
  - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
    - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Hal Abelson, 01/30/2015
      - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
    - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Ben Finney, 01/30/2015
      - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
    - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
  - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Rob Myers, 01/30/2015
  - Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
  - Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015