cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3
- From: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:00:45 +0100
Am Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015, 15:13:53 schrieb Sarah Pearson:
> We have created a wiki page
> <https://wiki.creativecommons.org/ShareAlike_compatibility_analysis:_GPL>
> for the proposal, which includes an initial comparison of the two licenses.
I like the table - it makes the differences and similarities quite clear.
I have one nitpick on the comparison: For “other versions” it states
for the GPL:
“Compliance with any version automatically permitted if no version
specified; otherwise no by default, but licensor may specify that
later/other versions allowable. No additional obligations are
imposed on authors where a reuser follows a later version. (§§14)”
It would be nice to add, that the suggested license text allows any
later version, and that there is an option to select a proxy who can
decide for each later version whether the works may be used under this
version (clause 14). Additionally clause 13 allows using the AGPL
(which is a GPL with added copyleft protection for applications which
are accessed over the network - a requirement for providing copyleft
in remote services).
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Celebrate with ye beauty and gather yer friends for a Pirate Party!
→ http://1w6.org/english/flyerbook-rules#pirate-party ←
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Hal Abelson, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?,
Ben Finney, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Rob Myers, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3,
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.