cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)
- From: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam AT benfinney.id.au>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:18:37 +0100
Am Freitag, 30. Januar 2015, 11:54:04 schrieb Ben Finney:
> Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>
> writes:
>
> > This email marks the opening of the public discussion on this mailing
> > list.
> Thank you for beginning this important work.
Thank you from my side, too!
The possibility to use CC by-sa licensed works together with GPL
licensed works to form a derivative work of both would make my life a
lot easier.
It would allow me to use works from Ryzoom together with works from
Battle for Wesnoth in the free RPG books I work on.
And it would make it easier to work on the writings, the artwork and
the code for a game which uses the rules of the RPG for a tactical
computer-RPG without having to worry about falling into licensing
traps.
Finally I could license my own drawings and poems under CC by-sa,
which would make it much easier for others to reuse them, while
preserving my ability combine all derivatives of my works with my
other works - regardless of the kind of work (song, image, text or
program - the latter two often require the GPL to preserve the
possibility to reuse the improvements made to derivative in practice).
Now know where I stand - I hope I can contribute to making the
compatibility of CC attribution-sharealike and GPLv3 or later work
out!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
singing a part of the history of free software:
- http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3,
Sarah Pearson, 01/29/2015
-
[cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Ben Finney, 01/29/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Hal Abelson, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?,
Ben Finney, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Rob Myers, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3,
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
-
[cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3),
Ben Finney, 01/29/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.