cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3
- From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:23:49 +0100
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:13:53 -0600 Sarah Pearson wrote:
> Creative Commons and the Free Software Foundation are pleased to formally
> propose the GNU General Public License v.3
> <http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html> as the next candidate for
> consideration under the ShareAlike compatibility process
> <https://wiki.creativecommons.org/ShareAlike_compatibility_process_and_criteria>.
> Note that we are pursuing one-way compatibility only, meaning BY-SA works
> could be adapted and GPLv3 applied, but not vice-versa.
I hope the GNU GPL v3 gets approved for one-way compatibility from
CC-by-sa.
As I have already said in the past, I would have preferred an explicit
conversion clause included in CC-by-sa-v4.0, but it's now too late for
this.
Anyway, I would encourage CC to also consider the GNU GPL v2 for
one-way compatibility from CC-by-sa.
See for instance this old message of mine:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2013-April/007381.html
I would also be happy to a one-way compatibility from CC-by to the zlib
license:
http://www.zlib.net/zlib_license.html
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpfUlwpVD4u2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Hal Abelson, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?,
Ben Finney, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?, Rob Myers, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work? (was: BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3), Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
-
Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3,
Sarah Pearson, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/31/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Arne Babenhauserheide, 01/30/2015
- Re: [cc-licenses] BY-SA compatibility proposal: GPLv3, Francesco Poli, 01/31/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.