Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Adam Fields <cc-licenses345982 AT aquick.org>]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 05:07:17PM -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 04:44 pm, Adam Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:35:53PM -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > so far there have been 2 comments on these.  if you think the
> > > > > definition is too vague & CC should do something to clarify it -
> > > > > let's discuss these guidelines!!!
> > >
> > > OK, I never before understood that a for profit could never properly use
> > > an NC work. Since I read the pdf, I cannot tell you how many people I
> > > have come across who see things as I did. (oops, responding in the wrong
> > > post.)
> >
> > Curious. Why is that not evident? By definition, everything a
> > for-profit corporation does is commercial.
> 
> Perhaps, but definition does not always match with reality. Should we 
> always 
> go with definition?

Now you've lost me. Can you give me an example of what you mean?

-- 
                                - Adam

** Expert Technical Project and Business Management
**** System Performance Analysis and Architecture
****** [ http://www.adamfields.com ]

[ http://www.aquick.org/blog ] ............ Blog
[ http://www.adamfields.com/resume.html ].. Experience
[ http://www.flickr.com/photos/fields ] ... Photos
[ http://www.aquicki.com/wiki ].............Wiki