baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Baslinux mailing list

List archive

Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary

From: 3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org
To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:09:02 +1300

sindi keesan wrote:
>
> He is also compiling a half-size current uclibc.

Which kernel includes is he using for the compile?
In order to work reliably with a 2.2 kernel, uclibc
needs to be compiled with 2.2 kernel includes.

Cheers,
Steven

[BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, David Moberg, 02/12/2007
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/13/2007
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/13/2007
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/17/2007
  - [BL] Browsers and the Web (was: new busybox 1.4.1 binary), Lee Forrest, 02/18/2007
    - Re: [BL] Browsers and the Web (was: new busybox 1.4.1 binary), Lee Forrest, 02/18/2007
  - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/24/2007
    - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, 3aoo-cvfd, 02/24/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/24/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/25/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, Karolis Lyvens, 02/25/2007
        
        Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, 3aoo-cvfd, 02/25/2007
        
        Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/25/2007