baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Baslinux mailing list

List archive

Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary

From: 3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org
To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:25:45 +1300

Karolis Lyvens wrote:
>
> One question: do I have to recompile the whole uclibc
> chroot environment (uclibc, gcc, busybox, utils)
> when using these 2.2.16 headers

That is the cleanest, most reliable method.

> or is it adequate to replace /usr/include/linux (which
> contains 2.4.31 kernel includes

I also replace /usr/include/asm, but that might not be
necessary.

> with includes/headers from SW7.1's k1/linuxinc.tgz,
> which contains 2.2.16 kernel includes?

Hopefully that will be enough.

Cheers,
Steven

Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary , (continued)
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/13/2007
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/13/2007
- Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/17/2007
  - [BL] Browsers and the Web (was: new busybox 1.4.1 binary), Lee Forrest, 02/18/2007
    - Re: [BL] Browsers and the Web (was: new busybox 1.4.1 binary), Lee Forrest, 02/18/2007
  - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/24/2007
    - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, 3aoo-cvfd, 02/24/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/24/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/25/2007
      - Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, Karolis Lyvens, 02/25/2007
        
        Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, 3aoo-cvfd, 02/25/2007
        
        Re: [BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary, sindi keesan, 02/25/2007