baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: t.maiden AT att.net
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:40:28 +0000
I have run DSL with 64 meg but normally with 128 meg. The only application I
know of that uses all the memory reserved (and the virtual processor) is
Firefox.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: sindi keesan <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, James Miller wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, 3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org wrote:
> >
> >> IIRC DSL needs a minumum of 64mb (or is it 128mb?).
> >
> > Last I checked they were claiming 32mb. Based on my experience with it
> > though, it would probably be too slow to be tolerable with only 32. A
> > swap partition might make it more useable at that amount of RAM.
> >
> > James
>
> We have used it okay with 32MB, but it was not happy with 24MB. Our
> laptop computers have 16MB and 24MB. Please remind me how to go to CLI
> instead of X when you boot, other than telling it to use VESAFB when you
> don't have that. That should save some RAM. What does DSL do with all
> that RAM?
>
> Sindi
> _______________________________________________
> BasLinux mailing list
> BasLinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/baslinux
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files
, (continued)
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
James Miller, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, James Miller, 04/16/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
Christian Brandt, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
Christian Brandt, 04/17/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, 3aoo-cvfd, 04/17/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
Christian Brandt, 04/17/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, sindi keesan, 04/16/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, t . maiden, 04/16/2006
- Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files, t . maiden, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
t . maiden, 04/16/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
3aoo-cvfd, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
David Moberg, 04/20/2006
-
[BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report,
James Miller, 04/20/2006
- Re: [BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report, sindi keesan, 04/21/2006
- Re: [BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report, David Moberg, 04/21/2006
- Re: [BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report, sindi keesan, 04/21/2006
- Re: [BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report, David Moberg, 04/25/2006
-
[BL] BL 3.40 preliminary GRUB report,
James Miller, 04/20/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
David Moberg, 04/20/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
3aoo-cvfd, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
sindi keesan, 04/19/2006
-
Re: [BL] BasicLinux 2.1 or 3.2 ISO files,
James Miller, 04/16/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.