Baslinux mailing list

[sindi keesan <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org wrote:
> > There is also the links-ssl version that you found
> > for uClibC.
>
> diet-libc
>
> > I don't recall what was wrong with it - is it larger
> > than 0.90?
>
> Yes and no.  The actual executable is larger than 0.90,
> but it has been compressed by the UPX executable packer.

Is the links-0.90 in BL3 also compressed with UPX?  If not I could 
compress it to make more RAMdisk space, right?

ftp://foobar.math.fu-berlin.de:2121/pub/dietlibc/bin-i386
binaries for dietlibc

links-ssl 405K May 2001
links     466K Nov 2002
elinks    462K July 2003

links-0.90 (not upxed?) is about 415K

I may try out elinks to see what it does better than the others.

They also have a 439K mutt - is this what Christoff used?
And a 226K bash which I could add to BL3 for installing dosemu with, if it 
is smaller than the SW4.0 version.