baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: "Sebas" <sebas1234 AT ono.com>
- To: <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:33:11 +0100
I've got a defrag application that defrags any DOS version. It can destroy
your LNF system. But if you haven't any, then nothing should happen. It is
designed to work even without permissions. I don't remember where I got it.
I'll have a look...
Salut.
Sebas.
----- Original Message -----
From: "sindi keesan" <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>
To: <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: RE: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Jim Howard wrote:
>
> > There is a version of MS-DOS that will run without Win98. It is called
> > MS-DOS 7.10 . Someone got permission from Microsoft to GNU GPL license
it. I
> > run it on my system and it appears to work fine. I was trying to locate
the
> > url where I downloaded it from. You might do a search on the internet
for
> > it.
> >
> > james
> >
> > I am looking for a way to use Win98 DOS without needing to use Win98, on
a
> > DOS/linux computer, that will let me defrag without having to boot some
> > other DOS from a floppy disk first.
>
>
> After much searching I found:
>
> http://newdos.yginfo.net/msdos71/index.htm
>
>
> You can download a boot disk .img file, or a pair of installation files
> (the first is 1.2MB, the second probably similar) for MS-DOS 7.10.
>
> I found another site that said you may not be able to defrag your hard
> drive with the defrag from 7.10 and would be told this is to protect long
> file names. Perhaps this is only if you have long file names (I don't
> outside of linux partitions). In this case they suggest using
> defragd.exe instead.
>
> I already put Win98 on the ASUS that would not boot linux without Win9X,
> but I have three other computers with the same problem, on which to try
> 7.10. One is still in use with linux on it. They are my favorites -
> 233MHz and 3 ISA slots. Many thanks!
>
> I think there is no Xvesa problem with 7.10 - probably only if you use
> smartdrv.exe, as in Win98. So this and FreeDOS and DR-DOS should all
> work with BL and Xvesa.
>
> 7.10 supports 32bit and long file names but the defrag from it does not.
-
Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy
, (continued)
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, sindi keesan, 11/25/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, Sheldon Isaac, 11/26/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, sindi keesan, 11/26/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, 3aoo-cvfd, 11/25/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, sindi keesan, 11/25/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, 3aoo-cvfd, 11/26/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, sindi keesan, 11/26/2004
- [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/26/2004
- RE: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, Jim Howard, 11/26/2004
- RE: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/26/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, Sebas, 11/27/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/27/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/30/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, 3aoo-cvfd, 11/30/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/30/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, James Miller, 11/27/2004
- Re: [BL] FreeDOS defrag vs Win98, sindi keesan, 11/27/2004
- Re: [BL] Re: My computers have gone crazy, sindi keesan, 11/26/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.