Baslinux mailing list

[3aoo-cvfd AT dea.spamcon.org]

sindi keesan wrote:
>
> Why did you use a 2.4 kernel, was that needed by uClibC?  

Yes, the uClibc compiling package does not work with a 
2.2 kernel.

> How much bigger would the kernel be for BL3 if you compiled 
> a 2.4 kernel with the same configuration as the current one?

I've just compiled a 2.4 version of the BL3 kernel.  It is
376kb bigger than the 2.2 version (and it doesn't help Xvesa,
which still crashes on the same programs).  

So I'm going to forget about the 2.4 kernel and go hunting
for some more applications that will work with Xvesa.  

Cheers,
Steven