Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Zech 1:19,21

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard3 AT earthlink.net>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Zech 1:19,21
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:27:33 -0500

Dear Steve,
[Steve Miller] I think the 4 workmen are the 4 workmen revealed in the
remaining chapters of Zechariah:
1. the builder in 6:12-13
2. the lowly king in 9:9
3. the shepherd in 11:4-14 & 13:7
4. the servant of the ground in 13:5

Another possibility is the measurer in 2:5 (2:1), but I think that is an
angel.

A theme throughout Zechariah is that God defeats the mighty by humble
device
(4:6). All 4 workmen are the Messiah, each from a different point of
view,
as in the 4 gospels.i

HH: I find these kinds of comments uncontrolled subjectivism. I have
never had any of these thoughts and don't think a natural reading of the
texts implies them. The four workmen are seen together. Thus the reader
expects them to be four different agents, not the same person depicted
four ways.
[Steve Miller] Harold, thanks for responding. I am using the Bible to
interpret the Bible, and Zechariah to interpret Zechariah. I hate
subjectivism in interpreting the Bible, and always desire to limit myself to
what the Bible says.

HH: You are limiting your subjectivism to the Bible, but it is still subjectivism. It is uncontrolled because it posits interpretations that run contrary to what the text says.

The New Testament explains the Old. Without the New
Testament explanation, many Old Testament passages cannot be understood.
However, the New Testament explanations of the Old still can be defended
purely from the Old Testament. Not because they are the most
straight-forward interpretations that a natural reading would give, but
because no other possible explanation fits.

Take Zech 11:8 "And I caused the three shepherds to perish in one month; and
My soul loathed them, and their soul also abhorred Me."

According to the most straight-forward reading of this Scripture, the 3
shepherds are 3 individuals, whom the Shepherd sent from God destroyed. But the 3 shepherds were not 3 individual leaders, but 3 groups who were the
leaders of the nation (Matthew 16:21; Mark 8:31; Luke 9:22; Psalm
118:22-23). And the Shepherd did not straight-forwardly destroy anyone.
These leaders caused themselves to perish by abhorring the Shepherd.

HH: This is another example of subjectivism, even more extreme perhaps. There is no reason to think that God did not destroy three shepherds, who naturally would be three individuals. The text does not say: "three groups of shepherds." You have no real warrant for jumping to such an unlikely conclusion. A "shepherd" is not equivalent to a group of shepherds and would not symbolize that. The term "month" could be used for a relatively short period of time, and the three shepherds could refer to three of the final leaders of Judah before the Babylonian captivity and the end of the kings. There was a lot of quick succession of rulers in both the northern and southern kingdoms before their downfall.
Isa 6:9-10 And he said, Go; and thou shalt say unto this people, Hearing ye
shall hear and shall not understand, and seeing ye shall see and shall not
perceive.
10 Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and blind
their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and
understand with their heart, and be converted, and healed.

Some prophesies are written in such a way that they cannot be understood by
a superficial reading. But the prophesies are not ambiguous. Only one
interpretation works when put to the test.

HH: Well, yours doesn't seem to work for the same reason that the other one doesn't. They are both contrary to the use of language and common sense. I have never heard this interpretation before, a sign that it is not the only one that can work.

I've read your previous post, and in it you do not give an answer as to what
the 4 workmen are. You say they might be angels, or they might be nations,
or they might be kings. They may have already come, or they may be coming in
the future.
I seek to understand God's word better than that.

HH: Well, try to understand it better. I don't have time for a full length investigation. But it is along those lines, not yours, which contradict what the text says, in both cases. You can't violate what the text says in the way you do and hope to be right. It is just subjectivism. It is four workmen, not one person in four roles. It is three shepherds, not three groups of shepherds.

Yours,
Harold Holmyard





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page