Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Awohili AT aol.com]

In a message dated 02/12/2003 12:51:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
rdehoop AT keyaccess.nl writes:

> Moreover, as far as I am aware with regard to the NT, Jesus teached us to
> call G-d "Father", "Abba"; why should we christians want to use a name 
> which
> is so precious in the Jewish tradition -in which the gentiles are only
> grafted! 
> 

True.  On the other hand, the leader of the Jerusalem assembly, James, says 
that God turned his attention to the Gentiles also, "to take from them a 
people for his name." (Acts 15:14, English Standard Version)  The UBS Hebrew 
version also renders this *'am lishmo*, "a people for his name."

I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the vocabulary of the 
Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere 
embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late date?

Solomon Landers
>From Polycarp66 AT aol.com  Wed Feb 12 11:41:31 2003
Return-Path: <Polycarp66 AT aol.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from imo-m07.mx.aol.com (imo-m07.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.162])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3712006A
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:41:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Polycarp66 AT aol.com
        by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id 3.196.158ba944 (14374);
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:42:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
Message-ID: <196.158ba944.2b7bd36b AT aol.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:42:19 EST
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
To: Awohili AT aol.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 4104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:41:31 -0000

In a message dated 2/12/2003 11:31:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
Awohili AT aol.com writes:

> I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the vocabulary of the 
> Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere 
> embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late date?
> 

And why should he not incorporate it?  To my knowledge the use of the 
theophoric nominal element in this word has never been excluded from Jewish 
worship.  Please correct me if I err regarding this, but I would think that 
in my visits to the synagogue I would have noted its absence.  The Psalms are 
not loath to use it.

gfsomsel
>From Polycarp66 AT aol.com  Wed Feb 12 11:42:35 2003
Return-Path: <Polycarp66 AT aol.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com (imo-r08.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.104])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295942008B
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:42:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Polycarp66 AT aol.com
        by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id 3.144.a5fba1b (14374);
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:43:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
Message-ID: <144.a5fba1b.2b7bd3b4 AT aol.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:43:32 EST
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
To: Awohili AT aol.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 4104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:42:35 -0000

In a message dated 2/12/2003 11:31:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
Awohili AT aol.com writes:

> I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the vocabulary of the 
> Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere 
> embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late date?
> 

And why should he not incorporate it?  To my knowledge the use of the 
theophoric nominal element in this word has never been excluded from Jewish 
worship.  Please correct me if I err regarding this, but I would think that 
in my visits to the synagogue I would have noted its absence.  The Psalms are 
not loath to use it.

gfsomsel
>From Polycarp66 AT aol.com  Wed Feb 12 11:44:22 2003
Return-Path: <Polycarp66 AT aol.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com (imo-r06.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.102])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B901120090
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:44:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Polycarp66 AT aol.com
        by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id 3.18d.162181a2 (14374);
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:44:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
Message-ID: <18d.162181a2.2b7bd409 AT aol.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:44:57 EST
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
To: Awohili AT aol.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 4104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:44:23 -0000

In a message dated 2/12/2003 11:31:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
Awohili AT aol.com writes:

> I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the vocabulary of the 
> Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere 
> embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late date?
> 

And why should he not incorporate it?  To my knowledge the use of the 
theophoric nominal element in this word has never been excluded from Jewish 
worship.  Please correct me if I err regarding this, but I would think that 
in my visits to the synagogue I would have noted its absence.  The Psalms are 
not loath to use it.

gfsomsel
>From BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com  Wed Feb 12 11:44:44 2003
Return-Path: <BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from server2.norisksoftware.com (dial-216-198-100-132.farmerstel.com
        [216.198.100.132])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7013420096
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:44:44 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] LORD
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:45:50 -0600
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: 
<5EF69A85945FFA44926EA595DA205F3502AFDF AT server2.norisksoftware.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [b-hebrew] LORD
Thread-Index: AcLStcg8juk73RFNTpWcFL1QYtbIzAAACI3w
From: "Bill Ross" <BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:44:45 -0000

Eli-Jah, Josi-yah, Jeremia-yah...

Apparently the combination is not the name itself, per se, so is not
ineffable.

Bill Ross
No Risk Software Inc
BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com [mailto:Polycarp66 AT aol.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Awohili AT aol.com; b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD

In a message dated 2/12/2003 11:31:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,=20
Awohili AT aol.com writes:

> I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the vocabulary of the

> Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere=20
> embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late
date?
>=20

And why should he not incorporate it?  To my knowledge the use of the=20
theophoric nominal element in this word has never been excluded from
Jewish=20
worship.  Please correct me if I err regarding this, but I would think
that=20
in my visits to the synagogue I would have noted its absence.  The
Psalms are=20
not loath to use it.

gfsomsel
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>From Polycarp66 AT aol.com  Wed Feb 12 11:47:12 2003
Return-Path: <Polycarp66 AT aol.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com (imo-r04.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.100])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD32320021
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:47:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Polycarp66 AT aol.com
        by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id 3.1d7.26f3735 (25098)
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:48:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
Message-ID: <1d7.26f3735.2b7bd4c9 AT aol.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:48:09 EST
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 4104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:47:12 -0000

My apologies for the multiple posting.  I seem to have been experiencing some 
difficulties with AOL.

gfsomsel
>From lizfried AT umich.edu  Wed Feb 12 11:49:18 2003
Return-Path: <lizfried AT umich.edu>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu (changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu
        [141.211.144.17])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A799D20089
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:49:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lizfried (pcp02370745pcs.sanarb01.mi.comcast.net
        [68.43.236.53])
        by changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu (8.9.3/3.2r) with SMTP id LAA16046
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:50:24 -0500 (EST)
From: "Lisbeth S. Fried" <lizfried AT umich.edu>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] LORD
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:54:49 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKDEKJBKDMCGCFJNKGEAAEMAA.lizfried AT umich.edu>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: 
<5EF69A85945FFA44926EA595DA205F3502AFDF AT server2.norisksoftware.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lizfried AT umich.edu
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
 <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman-2.1/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:49:18 -0000

What about the Israelite king Jehu,
is his not the name itself?????
Liz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of Bill Ross
> Sent: Wed, February 12, 2003 11:46 AM
> To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] LORD
>
>
> Eli-Jah, Josi-yah, Jeremia-yah...
>
> Apparently the combination is not the name itself, per se, so is not
> ineffable.
>
> Bill Ross
> No Risk Software Inc
> BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com [mailto:Polycarp66 AT aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: Awohili AT aol.com; b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2003 11:31:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> Awohili AT aol.com writes:
>
> > I often wonder why the writer of Revelation used the
> vocabulary of the
>
> > Tehillim in incorporating "Hallelu-yah" in his book.  Was it mere
> > embellishment, or an acknowledgement of the Name even at that late
> date?
> >
>
> And why should he not incorporate it?  To my knowledge the use of the
> theophoric nominal element in this word has never been excluded from
> Jewish
> worship.  Please correct me if I err regarding this, but I would think
> that
> in my visits to the synagogue I would have noted its absence.  The
> Psalms are
> not loath to use it.
>
> gfsomsel
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew