Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: Justin Rocha <jrocha AT sourcemage.org>
  • Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
  • Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 23:00:02 -0500

I prefer spells that can't work without gnome/kde be in those sections
and spells that can use them but are not dependent on them go into the
other sections.

The reason there was an xchat2 in gnome was it was the only irc that
worked with gtk+2/gnome2 at the time and since it was a beta it wound up
there.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 18:05, Justin Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 09:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > As for where packages go, I also like to keep gnome/kde products in those
> > sections, but then what about packages such as xchat? That depends on gtk
> > (which is actually GIMP, not GNOME, but GNOME uses it and so lots of
> > people
> > think GTK is GNOME) and such? That may not have been the best example,
> > but...
>
> I've always been of the opinion that spells should go in the section for
> that type of spell. IE, xchat in chat, evolution in mail, etc.
>
> It's always confused me why we have spells such as xchat2 (well, not any
> more) in gnome. xchat isn't even part of the gnome project! ;-)





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page