sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:37:44 -0700
On Thursday 04 September 2003 04:05 pm, Justin Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 09:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > As for where packages go, I also like to keep gnome/kde products in those
> > sections, but then what about packages such as xchat? That depends on
> > gtk (which is actually GIMP, not GNOME, but GNOME uses it and so lots of
> > people think GTK is GNOME) and such? That may not have been the best
> > example, but...
>
> I've always been of the opinion that spells should go in the section for
> that type of spell. IE, xchat in chat, evolution in mail, etc.
>
> It's always confused me why we have spells such as xchat2 (well, not any
> more) in gnome. xchat isn't even part of the gnome project! ;-)
"I'll agree, Chuck."
The issue I have is that I occasionally go 'shopping' for programs. When I
do, I have to browse the section where the bulk of them are, and then the KDE
and GNOME sections so that I don't miss anything. I have learned to deal
with it, so it certainly won't break my heart if it doesn't happen, but it
sure would make the 'shopping trips' take less time.
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Hamish Greig, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Justin Rocha, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Robin Cook, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Dufflebunk, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Tony Smith, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.