Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
  • To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
  • Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:37:44 -0700

On Thursday 04 September 2003 04:05 pm, Justin Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 09:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > As for where packages go, I also like to keep gnome/kde products in those
> > sections, but then what about packages such as xchat? That depends on
> > gtk (which is actually GIMP, not GNOME, but GNOME uses it and so lots of
> > people think GTK is GNOME) and such? That may not have been the best
> > example, but...
>
> I've always been of the opinion that spells should go in the section for
> that type of spell. IE, xchat in chat, evolution in mail, etc.
>
> It's always confused me why we have spells such as xchat2 (well, not any
> more) in gnome. xchat isn't even part of the gnome project! ;-)


"I'll agree, Chuck."

The issue I have is that I occasionally go 'shopping' for programs. When I
do, I have to browse the section where the bulk of them are, and then the KDE
and GNOME sections so that I don't miss anything. I have learned to deal
with it, so it certainly won't break my heart if it doesn't happen, but it
sure would make the 'shopping trips' take less time.


--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page