sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:25:01 +0200
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:18:14AM +0000, Jose Bernardo Silva wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:16:32 -0500, Geoffrey Derber wrote
>
> [...]
> > dedicated maintainer. It's been a long time since openoffice has
> > succesfully compiled for anyone. The original developer at one
> > point even decided to give up on the spell because it was so
> > difficult, and he was tired of working on it. I've picked up on it
> > recently, in the last few days, and it fails after about 17 hrs for
> > me. Waiting 17hrs, hoping that a spell will work, to find it fail
> > can be frustraiting.
>
> Geoff,
>
> Just a small correction - I hadn't given up on maintaining the OO spell -
> in
> fact, I was trying to get it to work rewriting it, adapting the scripts in
> Mandrake's source RPM. But I have been chronically short of time, which in
> this case almost amounted to having given up on the spell.
> Besides that, the stupid policies at work (no laptops connected to the
> company network, no webmail, reduced use of the internet, etc.) managed to
> reduce the litle time I had.
> I was happy when I saw a new OO spell, based on the 1.1 branch. I do hope
> it
> will need less hacks and patches than the ones using the 1.0 branch - we
> need
> that spell working.
>
> Ok, I've ranted enough - now that I am "free" of the OO spell, time to try
> getting a arm cross compile working.
Did anyone try the oobuild stuff in gnome-cvs? it's supposed to
download, compile and install OO. Maybe some of the stuff in there could
be useful.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Hamish Greig, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Justin Rocha, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Robin Cook, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Dufflebunk, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Tony Smith, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Robin Cook, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Casey Harkins, 09/05/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.