sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:41:39 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:27, Jason Flatt wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2003 07:10 pm, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
> > Can we get back to the original topic, the possible creation of a new
> > section for 'office' spells.
> >
> > The debate between flat / tree grimoire, or if we should include
> > variables KEYWORD, SPELL, etc. is another discussion.
> >
> > Geoff
>
> While I agree that openoffice probably doesn't belong in editors, I'm not
> sure that there are enough programs currently in the main grimoires that
> would support the creation of the new section.
I actually like having spells that depend on gnome or kde in the kde/gnome
sections. I think it is cleaner having all qt-x11 based spells in kde and
wish we could do the same for gtk+2.
maybe a good place for openoffice would be a new section "productivity" or
"workstation" or "desktop" you can see i have no idea what the name should be
but many things could go into this section.
office suites, web browsers, integrated tools like evolution2 (bad example it
relies heavily on gnome2 but you get my drift).
the things you want if you are setting up a working office machine.
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/VqZo8fSufZR6424RAnFyAJsFPr6QOkypM2NN4k/nKCZvwfMkVQCffYGt
GLeVKAGYJQSMvlulzB8kIGc=
=uSpL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Hamish Greig, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Justin Rocha, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Robin Cook, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.