sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Justin Rocha <jrocha AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:05:19 -0700
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 09:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> As for where packages go, I also like to keep gnome/kde products in those
> sections, but then what about packages such as xchat? That depends on gtk
> (which is actually GIMP, not GNOME, but GNOME uses it and so lots of people
> think GTK is GNOME) and such? That may not have been the best example,
> but...
I've always been of the opinion that spells should go in the section for
that type of spell. IE, xchat in chat, evolution in mail, etc.
It's always confused me why we have spells such as xchat2 (well, not any
more) in gnome. xchat isn't even part of the gnome project! ;-)
--
Justin Rocha
-Xenith || jrocha AT sourcemage.org || http://xenith.org/
JabberID: xenith AT dhbit.ca || AIM: JustinR98
Grimoire Guru for FTP and Web Guy
Source Mage GNU/Linux -> http://www.sourcemage.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Hamish Greig, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Justin Rocha, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Robin Cook, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Dufflebunk, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Tony Smith, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.