sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:16:42 -0500
Hamish Greig wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:27, Jason Flatt wrote:
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 07:10 pm, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
Can we get back to the original topic, the possible creation of a new
section for 'office' spells.
The debate between flat / tree grimoire, or if we should include
variables KEYWORD, SPELL, etc. is another discussion.
Geoff
While I agree that openoffice probably doesn't belong in editors, I'm not
sure that there are enough programs currently in the main grimoires that
would support the creation of the new section.
I actually like having spells that depend on gnome or kde in the kde/gnome sections. I think it is cleaner having all qt-x11 based spells in kde and wish we could do the same for gtk+2.
What I don't like about that idea, you could almost continue that logic,
and say almost everything relies on glibc, therefore put them all in devel.
maybe a good place for openoffice would be a new section "productivity" or "workstation" or "desktop" you can see i have no idea what the name should be but many things could go into this section.
office suites, web browsers, integrated tools like evolution2 (bad example it relies heavily on gnome2 but you get my drift).
the things you want if you are setting up a working office machine.
Hamish
I think I'd rather have stuff based more on their usage, rather than the
libraries they use. I personally think evolution(2) might better fit
into the mail section, and have little more than the gnome project
itself in the gnome sections.
An Office / Productivity section, would better suite the purposes of
some of this software.
Geoff
-
[SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Hamish Greig, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Justin Rocha, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Robin Cook, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Jason Flatt, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Dufflebunk, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Geoffrey Derber, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?, Jason Flatt, 09/04/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: SMGL at work (WAS: new section office?), Dufflebunk, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Seth Woolley, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] new section office?,
Duane Malcolm, 09/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.